|
Dismissal Effective March 19,2011 Respondent was alleged to have committed professional misconduct in a contested probate matter by allegedly signing and filing a petition...
| Concepts: | respondent ; panel ; matter ; surcharge ; petition ; probate ; Grievance Administrator ; preponderance of the evidence ; allegations |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Farmington Hills |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
On May 4,2017, Tri-County Hearing Panel #1 of the Attorney Discipline Board issued an order suspending respondent's license to practice law in Michigan for a period of 180...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; review proceedings ; Grievance Administrator ; Attorney Discipline Board ; respondent ; costs ; amount ; proper evidentiary ; practice law ; findings of misconduct ; consideration of the briefs ; cross-petition |
| Type: | Order |
| City: | Farmington Hills |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
Respondent filed a petition for review seeking to have the hearing panel's findings of misconduct vacated, or if affirmed, seeking a reduction in the discipline imposed. ...
| Concepts: | Judge Burton ; responsibility ; allegations ; disqualification ; hearing panel ; formal complaint ; summary disposition ; conspiracy petition ; framework ofthe ABA Standards ; Court ofAppeals ; discipline imposed ; interlocutory review ; facts recited ; day suspension ; reinstatement ; panels |
| Type: | Opinion |
| City: | Farmington Hills |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
After proceedings in accordance with MCR 9.115, the hearing panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct resulting from his filing of two documents in Wayne...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; Grievance Administrator ; respondent ; discipline ; Michigan Supreme ; filing ; misconduct ; Total costs ; practice law ; improper purpose ; Wayne County ; committed professional ; cross-petition |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Farmington Hills |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|