|
1) Suspension - thirty (30) days; 2) Effective December 16, 1995. Respondent admitted that he failed to keep in adequate communication with a divorce client or to keep her...
Concepts: | respondent ; Michigan Rules ; parties stipulated ; divorce client ; adequate communication ; practice of law ; amount ; Costs |
Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
December 13, 1995 suspending the license of respondent Mark L. Brown for a period of thirty (30) days. The hearing panel's order was based upon its approval of a stipulatio...
Concepts: | Grievance Administrator ; hearing panel ; respondent ; stipulation ; consent discipline ; accordance ; Mark ; formal complaint ; Supreme Court ; complainant Agnew ; prosecution arm ; professional misconduct ; allegations ; power of superintending |
Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
The only issue before the hearing panel was the determination of the appropriate level of discipline to be imposed. The Grievance Administrator petitioned the Board for...
Concepts: | Grievance Administrator ; hearing panels ; formal complaints ; respondent ; discipline ; Glenn ; Baumgartner ; language of ABA Standard ; finding of misconduct ; potential injury ; legal profession ; mental state ; Michigan Supreme Court ; determination ; day suspension ; failure |
Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
Notice Issued: March 14, 2002 Mark L. Brown, P-39562, Detroit, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board, vacating an Order of Reprimand entered by Tri-County Hearing...
Concepts: | hearing panel ; day suspension ; respondent ; reprimand ; Discipline Board ; Michigan Rules ; Grievance Commission ; conditions relative ; Notice Issued |
Type: | Notice |
City: | Detroit |
County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
Mark L. Brown, P-39562, Detroit, Michigan. Effective April 8, 2002. Respondent was suspended from the practice of law in Michigan for 30 days effective March 9, 2002. In...
Concepts: | respondent ; Michigan ; affidavit of compliance ; practice of law ; suspension ; accordance ; Detroit ; Brown |
Type: | Notice |
City: | Detroit |
County: | Wayne |
|
|