|
|
Tri-County Hearing Panel #7 issued an order of suspension and restitution in this matter on June 19, 2020, which ordered the suspension of respondent's license to practice...
Concepts: | hearing panel ; suspension ; Grievance Administrator ; interim stay ; respondent ; Discipline Board ; request ; restitution ; irreparable harm ; fuller consideration ; counsel sufficient ; practice law ; cross-petition |
Type: | Board Order |
City: | Plymouth |
County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
Suspension and Restitution on June 19, 2020, which ordered the suspension of respondent's license to practice law in Michigan for three years, and the payment of $19,752.10...
Concepts: | respondent ; stay pursuant ; Discipline Board ; Grievance Administrator ; practicing law ; hearing panel ; restitution ; clients ; legal services ; written consent ; receipt requested ; certified mail ; affidavit of compliance ; compensation ; disqualification ; correspondence |
Type: | Order |
City: | Plymouth |
County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
The hearing panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct by regularly misusing his IOLTA (Count One), while representing a client in an employment discrimin...
Concepts: | hearing panel ; respondent ; clients ; violation ; stay ; practice law ; service charges ; statement of material ; discipline ; restitution ; reconsideration ; Grievance Administrator ; representation ; positions of the parties ; preparation ; connection |
Type: | Notice |
City: | Plymouth |
County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
Tri-County Hearing Panel #7 of the Attorney Discipline Board issued an order on June 19, 2020, suspending respondent’s license to practice law in Michigan for a period of...
Concepts: | respondent ; hearing panels ; Grievance Administrator ; Carl Novick ; business expenses ; restitution ; funds ; Novick ; Discipline Board ; ABA Standards ; tax debts ; IOLTA ; three-year suspension ; interim stay ; earned fees ; applicable law |
Type: | Opinion |
City: | Plymouth |
County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
On June 19, 2020, Tri-County Hearing Panel #7 of the Attorney Discipline Board issued an order suspending respondent’s license to practice law in Michigan for a period of...
Concepts: | hearing panel ; Discipline Board ; respondent ; stay ; restitution ; practice law ; amount ; payment ; reconsideration ; Grievance Administrator ; Alan Gershel ; member Linda ; instruction sheet ; Carl Novick ; Supreme Court ; reinstatement |
Type: | Board Order |
City: | Plymouth |
County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
Disbarment - Effective September 29, 20211 After proceedings conducted pursuant to MCR 9.115, the panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct during his...
Concepts: | respondent ; practice of law ; violation ; lawyer ; amount ; matter ; representation ; continuously suspended ; Attorney Discipline Board ; reflected adversely ; involved deceit ; wrongful discharge ; professional misconduct ; conducted pursuant ; trustworthiness ; misrepresentation |
Type: | Notice |
City: | Plymouth |
County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
After proceedings conducted pursuant to MCR 9.115, the hearing panel found that respondent committed professional misconduct as charged in three counts of a four-count Formal
Concepts: | respondent ; three-year suspension ; interim stay ; practice law ; panel found ; Attorney Discipline Board ; restitution ; clients ; Michigan Supreme Court ; reconsideration ; representation ; total amount ; counsel sufficient ; IOLTA account ; cross-petition |
Type: | Notice |
City: | Plymouth |
County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
This case has been fully litigated and is closed. On August 3, 2021, the Michigan Supreme Court denied respondent’s application for leave to appeal from this Board’s April...
Concepts: | Supreme Court ; respondent ; hearing panels ; Discipline Board ; Grievance Administrator ; Lawrence ; relief ; misconduct ; lawyer knowingly ; collateral estoppel ; res judicata ; three-year suspension ; denying leave ; reconsideration ; misappropriation |
Type: | Board Order |
City: | Plymouth |
County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
Michigan, effective September 29, 2021.1 On September 23, 2021, respondent timely filed a petition for review. On review, respondent argues for a reversal of the panel’s...
Concepts: | hearing panel ; findings of misconduct ; fee agreement ; Grievance Administrator ; ABA Standards ; respondent ; formal complaint ; applicable aggravating ; personal account ; Discipline Board ; settlement proceeds ; evidentiary support ; Board members ; amount ; Gershel recused ; imposed sanction |
Type: | Board Order |
City: | Plymouth |
County: | Wayne |
|
|
|

Document Type:

Attorney:

Year:
|