|
Revocation Effective July 30,2008 Respondent admitted in his answer that he committed professional misconduct, which included conversion of client funds; misappropriation...
| Concepts: | client ; respondent ; funds ; discipline ; Michigan Rules ; law ; Van Bolt ; panel ordered ; inappropriate transfer ; expense reports ; endorsement ; Revocation |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Grand Rapids |
| County: | Kent |
|
|
|
|
The misconduct committed in this case was described by the hearing panel in its report: Respondent admittedto conversion, deceiving aclientand intentional dishonesty. The...
| Concepts: | respondent ; misconduct ; practice law ; impairments ; VanOstenberg ; conversion ; reports ; sleep apnea ; Grievance Administrator ; public interest ; personality ; female patients ; deficit disorder ; testimony covered ; general counsel ; Martha Burkett |
| Type: | Opinion |
| City: | Grand Rapids |
| County: | Kent |
|
|
|
|
Revocation Effective July 30,2008 Respondent admitted in his answer that he committed professional misconduct, which included conversion of client funds; misappropriation...
| Concepts: | client ; respondent ; funds ; discipline ; panel ; Michigan Rules ; law ; revocation ; Total costs ; inappropriate transfer ; expense reports ; endorsement |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Grand Rapids |
| County: | Kent |
|
|