|
1) Suspension - 45 days; 2) Effective June 30, 1992. The respondent failed to answer the formal complaint, but appeared at the hearing held in Lansing on Monday, May 4, 1992.
| Concepts: | formal complaints ; respondent ; panel determined ; amount ; Costs ; Lansing ; Effective ; Suspension |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for consent order of discipline pursuant to MCR 9.115 (F)(5), which was approved by the hearing panel and...
| Concepts: | respondent ; consent ; Grievance Commission ; client ; Counsel System ; complaint alleged ; appellate ; conviction ; nolo contendere ; hearing panel ; discipline pursuant |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
9.115(F)(5), which was approved by the hearing panel and the Attorney Grievance Commission. Respondent was appointed to represent the defendant in post-conviction...
| Concepts: | Respondent ; client ; post-conviction relief ; courts seeking ; Grievance Commission ; hearing panel ; amount ; Costs |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
2) Effective March 3, 1994. Respondent failed to answer the formal complaint, but appeared at the hearing held in Lansing on December 21, 1993. Respondent's default was...
| Concepts: | formal complaint ; respondent ; panel ; transcripts ; Court ; day suspension ; Michigan Rules ; Attorney Grievance Commission ; reasonable communication ; successor counsel ; appellate action ; correspondence |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|