|
Effective June 26, 1986. The Respondent was appointed in February 1984 to file an appeal on behalf of a defendant convicted of a criminal offense in Oakland County. The...
| Concepts: | Respondent ; conviction ; court ; second Complaint ; allega tiona ; Panel concluded ; hia client ; Oakland County ; criminal offense ; substitution of attorneys ; support of the motion ; correspondence |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Pontiac |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
1) Suspension - eight months; 2) Effective January 4, 1988. The respondent was originally suspended for a period of ninety days effective January 8, 1988 by a hearing...
| Concepts: | respondent ; Discipline board ; hearing panel ; client ; suspension ; court ; cause proceedings ; prior reprimand ; formal complaint ; retainer fee ; reconsideration ; Administrator |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
The Attorney Discipline Board has considered the Petition for Review filed by the Grievance Administrator which requests that the ninety-day suspension imposed by the...
| Concepts: | responsibility ; hearing panel ; failure ; attorneys ; misconduct ; suspension ; Grievance Administrator ; Formal Complaint ; legal system ; Peter Moray ; discrimination suit ; practice of law ; allegations ; indifference ; Shirley Stanley |
| Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
|
1) Reprimand; 2) Effective October 21, 1988. The Respondent engaged in the practice of law in violation of an Order of Suspension in ADB Case No. 151-87. Respondent...
| Concepts: | Respondent ; discipline ; violation ; sentence hearings ; criminal defendants ; Administrator automatically ; practice of law ; amount ; understanding |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
48053, The Respondent engaged in the practice of law in violation of an Order of Suspension in ADB Case No. 151-87. was his belief that the Petition for Review filed by...
| Concepts: | discipline ; violation ; Professional Responsibility ; sentence hearings ; criminal defendants ; Administrator automatically ; practice of law ; Canons ; understanding |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Pontiac |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
4, 1988. The respondenc was or~g~nally suspended for a period of ninety days effective January 8, 1988 by a hearing panel of the Atcorney Discipline board whlch found that...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; respondent ; Supreme Court ; client ; discipline ; rmmediace consideracion ; cause proceedings ; prror reprimand ; Atcorney Disciplrne ; formal complaint ; Eot Lnvescigac ; retainer fee ; days effective ; suspenslon of elglic ; Aduiniscrator |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Pontiac |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
1) Suspension - 119 days; 2) Effective March 12, 1992. The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for consent order of discipline pursuant to MCR...
| Concepts: | respondent ; Grievance Administrator ; suspension ; States District ; stipulation ; interim ; federal custody ; income tax ; willful failure ; hearing panel ; discipline pursuant ; affidavit of compliance |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|