|
BOARD OPINION The respondent was reprimanded by a hearing panel for her admitted failure to file a timely answer to a Request for Investigation. The respondent seeks...
Concepts: | panel ; hearings ; discipline ; failure ; separate ; Request ; respondents ; Grievance Administrator ; Upper Peninsula ; County Courthouse ; practice of law ; allegations ; quarterly payments ; formal complaint |
Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
Sandra S. Schultz, P-30269, Ironwood, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board affirming a hearing panel order of reprimand. 1) Reprimand; 2) Effective May 30, 1990. ...
Concepts: | hearing panel ; Attorney Discipline Board ; respondent ; reprimand ; costs ; unblemished record ; admitted failure ; charges of misconduct |
Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
The hearing panel in this case issued an Order of Reprimand following its determination that the respondent, Sandra S. Schultz, neglected a legal matter entrusted to her and...
Concepts: | legal matter ; respondent ; Schultz ; reprimand ; Sandra ; Professional Responsibility ; Board Opinion ; misconduct ; evidentiary support ; Wisconsin court ; formal complaint ; aggravating effect ; administration of justice |
Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
2) Effective September 14, 1991. The hearing panel found that misconduct was established by a preponderance of the evidence. Respondent was retained to further the...
Concepts: | Respondent ; panel ; discipline ; day suspension ; Board increased ; grievance administrator ; preponderance of the evidence ; amount ; reconsideration ; prosecution |
Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
The panel found misconduct on two counts of failing to safeguard a client's assets; one count of conflict of interest; and two counts of failure to respond to requests for...
Concepts: | panel ordered ; found misconduct ; respondent ; counts ; Wisconsin ; discipline ; petition ; amount ; Michigan Rules ; legal matter ; involved neglect ; health counselling ; suspensions ; restitution |
Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
Respondent's license to practice law in Wisconsin was suspended for two years by the Wisconsin Supreme Court effective January 10, 1994. The Wisconsin court found that...
Concepts: | respondent ; Wisconsin Supreme ; practice law ; suspension ; panel ; circuit ; client ; total amount ; Attorney Discipline Board ; adequate proof ; expert witness ; remained pending ; medical malpractice ; adjudication of misconduct ; appeal of the dismissal ; inappropriate |
Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
On January 10, 1994, the Wisconsin Supreme Court suspended respondent Schultz for two years for misconduct described by the court as follows: neglect of a client's medical...
Concepts: | respondent ; Supreme Court ; client ; Sandra Schultz ; scheduling conference ; reference ; Russell Slade ; discipline ; Grievance Administrator ; recommendations ; disposition ; Board Opinion ; inappropriate |
Type: | Opinion |
|
|