|
Respondent's conduct was found to be in violation of MCR 9.104(1-4, 7); MCR 9.103(C); MCR 9.113(B)(2); and Canons 1, 6 and 7 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, DR...
| Concepts: | Respondent ; Attorney Discipline Board ; Professional Responsibility ; consideration of the petitions ; amount ; Costs ; panel ; findings |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
thirty (30) days for his failure to file an answer to a Request for Investigation. We affirm the decision of the hearing panel that the respondent has failed to show that...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; respondent ; failure ; Request ; suspension ; misconduct warranting ; formal complaints ; Discipline Board ; Matter of David ; Grievance Administrator |
| Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
|
James R. Bandy, P-28790, Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan, by the Attorney Discipline Board affirming a hearing panel order of suspension. 1) Suspension - thirty days; 2)...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; respondent ; suspension ; Michigan Supreme Court ; seeking reduction ; Professional Responsibility ; Grosse Pointe Farms ; amount |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
Attorney Discipline Board affirming a hearing panel order of suspension. 2) Effective February 25, 1991. The hearing panel found that respondent delivered nine checks...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; Attorney Discipline Board ; respondent ; suspension ; petition ; Michigan Supreme Court ; citing improper ; Grievance Administrator ; Professional Responsibility ; formal complaint ; immigration matter ; insufficient funds |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|