|
1. Suspension - 30 Days 2. Effective January 20, 2006 The hearing panel found that respondent deposited in his own account funds resulting from the cashing of a client...
| Concepts: | funds ; respondent ; panel ; Michigan Rules ; Attorney Discipline Board ; timely condition ; Grievance Administrator ; law firm |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Monroe |
| County: | Monroe |
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey A. Dulany, P 26768, Monroe, Michigan. Effective February 21, 2006 Respondent was suspended from the practice of law in Michigan for 30 days effective January 20,...
| Concepts: | respondent ; Michigan ; Attorney Discipline Board ; Grievance Administrator ; affidavit of compliance ; practice of law ; advisement ; matter |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Monroe |
| County: | Monroe |
|
|
|
|
The Grievance Administrator seeks review by the Attorney Discipline Board on the grounds that the panel below erred by imposing a suspension of less than 180 days. For the...
| Concepts: | Grievance Administrator ; respondent ; panel ; suspension ; check ; firm ; office manager ; trust account ; Tara Lucci ; custody matter ; Ruth Flint ; legal services ; partial payment ; remorseful ; possession ; misconduct |
| Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
|
increasing Washtenaw County Hearing Panel #1's order of discipline from a 30 day suspension to a 180 day suspension. The hearing panel found that respondent, while employed...
| Concepts: | day suspension ; respondent ; discipline ; hearing panel ; firm ; Michigan Rules ; Total costs ; Grievance Administrator ; own account ; reinstatement ; cross-petition |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Monroe |
| County: | Monroe |
|
|
|
|
Reinstated Effective April 16, 2007 Petitioner's license to practice law in Michigan was suspended for 180 days, effective October 28, 2006. His petition for reinstateme...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; reinstatement ; petitioner ; accordance ; Michigan ; law ; court rules ; respondent ; eligibility |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Monroe |
|
|