|
Investigation. Respondent appeared before the hearing panel in Troy on July 21, 1988, and admitted the factual allegations contained in the Formal Complaint. Respondent'...
| Concepts: | Respondent ; factual allegations ; violation ; Complaint ; Troy ; Formal |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Birmingham |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
The hearing panel in this matter issued an order suspending the respondent's license to practice law for 120 days based upon its finding that the respondent appeared in...
| Concepts: | respondent ; practice law ; suspension ; client ; matter ; court ; formal complaints ; Discipline Board ; reinstatement ; appearance ; provisions ; misconduct ; allegations ; Forty-sixth District ; aggravating |
| Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
|
Discipline Board affirming a hearing panel order of suspension. Respondent failed to answer the formal complaint, but appeared at the hearing held in Bloomfield Hills on...
| Concepts: | formal complaint ; hearing panel ; respondent ; Attorney Discipline Board ; suspension ; client ; Supreme Court ; costs ; retainer fee ; matter effective ; practice law ; Bloomfield Hills |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
1) Revocation; 2) Effective July 25, 1991. Respondent failed to answer the formal complaints, but appeared at the hearing held in Detroit on May 20, 1991. Respondent's...
| Concepts: | formal complaints ; Respondent ; attorney ; court ; filing fees ; check drawn ; prior matter ; panel determined ; affidavit of compliance ; practice of law ; nonpayment of disciplinary |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
1. Suspension - 180 Days 2. Effective April 1, 2005 The respondent appeared at the hearing but was found to be in default for his failure to file an answer to the formal...
| Concepts: | respondent ; complaint ; panel ; client ; Michigan Rules ; civil suit ; amount ; practice ; violation ; discovery ; counter-complaint ; Effective ; Suspension |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Walled Lake |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
1. Suspension - 180 Days 2. Effective September 28, 2005 The Grievance Administrator filed a petition on July 8, 2005 seeking entry of an order of additional discipline...
| Concepts: | Grievance Administrator ; hearing panel ; respondent ; suspension ; practiced law ; Eugene Ostrowe ; cover letter ; unsigned affidavit ; County Prosecutor ; testimony presented ; seeking entry ; disqualification |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Walled Lake |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
2. Effective June 17, 20061 On February 15, 2006, the Grievance Administrator filed a petition for an order to show cause why additional discipline should not be imposed...
| Concepts: | respondent ; Grievance Administrator ; discipline ; cause ; practice law ; court ; attorney ; panel ordered ; Wayne County ; hearing held ; responsive pleadings ; pending appeal ; repeated failure ; disqualification |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Walled Lake |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
2. Effective September 28, 2005 The Grievance Administrator filed a petition on July 8, 2005 seeking entry of an order of additional discipline for respondent's failure to...
| Concepts: | Grievance Administrator ; hearing panel ; respondent ; petition ; practiced law ; costs ; discipline ; suspension ; Eugene Ostrowe ; cover letter ; unsigned affidavit ; County Prosecutor ; testimony presented ; seeking entry ; disqualification |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Walled Lake |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
Effective June 17, 201 1 The respondent failed to appear at the hearing and was found to be in default for his failure to file an answer to the formal complaint. Based on...
| Concepts: | respondent ; Grievance Administrator ; client ; practice ; fee ; matter ; continuously suspended ; Euaene Ostrowe ; revocation issued ; run consecutively ; panel ordered ; investigation served ; summary disposition ; telephone calls ; formal complaint ; representation |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Walled Lake |
|
|