|
1. Dismissal 2. Effective December 29, 2005 The Grievance Administrator filed Formal Complaint 04-48-GA alleging that respondent committed misconduct in a medical...
| Concepts: | Formal Complaint ; running of the statute of limitations ; forming ; respondent ; dismissing ; malpractice ; misconduct ; GA ; hearing panel ; Michigan Rules ; unearned fees ; circuit court ; statutory elements ; Grievance Administrator ; misappropriating |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Detroit |
| County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
|
1. Interim Suspension 2. Effective July 18, 2006 On July 18, 2006, a public hearing was held in which the panel found that respondent had committed misconduct. In...
| Concepts: | panel ; respondent ; practice law ; Interim Suspension ; Michigan ; accordance ; misconduct |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Detroit |
| County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to MCR 9.1 15(H), the hearing panel originally entered an interim order that suspended respondent's license to practice law in Michigan for a period of three years,...
| Concepts: | respondent ; Grievance Administrator ; client funds ; panel found ; suspension ; request ; conditions relevant ; pay restitution ; investigation served ; attorney fee ; reasonable diligence ; involving dishonesty ; formal complaint ; cross-petition ; trustworthiness ; misrepresentation |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Detroit |
| County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to MCR 9.115(H), the hearing panel originally entered an interim order that suspended respondent's license to practice law in Michigan for a period of three years,...
| Concepts: | respondent ; panel ; Grievance Administrator ; client funds ; suspension ; request ; matter ; conditions relevant ; pay restitution ; investigation served ; attorney fee ; reasonable diligence ; profession orthe ; reconsideration ; trustworthiness ; misrepresentation |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Detroit |
| County: | Wayne |
|
|
|
|
Panel #1 suspending respondent's license to practice law for a period of 180 days and requiring restitution to respondent'sclient and completion ofa professional enhancement...
| Concepts: | respondent ; clients ; Julie Winnie ; representation ; master ; ofthe ; panel ; law ; master found ; formal complaint ; funds ; violations ; allegations ; purposes ofthis ; misapplication offunds ; Grievance Administrator vKavanaugh |
| Type: | Opinion |
| City: | Southfield |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
24, 2010, and ordering respondent to make restitution to complainant Nash Kesto in the amount of $55,100.00. 9.118, including a review of the testimony and exhibits...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; respondent ; documentary evidence ; Nash Kesto ; testimony ; amount ; attorney fees ; written agreement ; proper evidentiary ; Grievance Administrator ; credibility ; restitution ; Michigan Rules ; aggravating ; investments |
| Type: | Board Order |
|
|
|
|
Effective June 24,20101 The respondent appeared at the public hearing, but was found to be in default for his failure to file an answer to the formal complaint. Based on...
| Concepts: | respondent ; hearing panel ; client ; Michigan Rules ; amount ; restitution ; law ; practice ; continuously suspended ; Attorney Discipline Board ; disciplinary authority ; improper agreement ; formal complaint |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Detroit |
| County: | Wayne |
|
|