|
1) Reprimand; 2) Effective June 7, 1996. Respondent was retained to represent a client in a bankruptcy matter, and instituted bankruptcy proceedings on her behalf. He...
| Concepts: | bankruptcy proceedings ; respondent ; allegations ; matter ; client ; reprimand ; Michigan Rules ; Professional ; parties stipulated ; confirmation plan |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
On March 22, 2010, Tri-County Hearing Panel #66 of the Attorney Discipline Board issued an order suspending respondent's license to practice law in Michigan for a period of...
| Concepts: | Attorney Discipline ; respondent ; practicing law ; hearing panel ; Grievance Administrator ; client ; reinstatement ; restitution ; legal services ; written consent ; public authority ; applicable provisions ; medical doctor ; compensation ; disqualification ; correspondence |
| Type: | Board Order |
|
|
|
|
Tri-County Hearing Panel #66 ofthe Attorney Discipline Board entered an order suspending respondent's license to practice law for 179 days, with a condition that respondent...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; Grievance Administrator ; respondent ; Discipline Board ; attorney ; trust account ; ofthe ; professional misconduct ; civil judgments ; court ordered ; factual allegations ; reasons discussed ; reinstatement ; court ; judgment ; withholding taxes |
| Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
|
United States, including, but not limited to: attempting to evade or defeat tax, 26 USC § 7201; willful failure to pay over tax, willful failure to file return, supply...
| Concepts: | respondent ; Supreme Court ; immediate consideration ; day suspension ; stay of discipline ; amount ; restitution ; Total costs ; Grievance Administrator ; practice law ; service charges ; disciplinary authority ; sufficient funds ; United States ; reconsideration ; cross-petition |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Bingham Farms |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|