|
FACTS Respondent was charged with misconduct due to his mishandling of a personal injury case, and his delay in probating an estate. The Formal Complaint contained...
| Concepts: | Respondent ; personal injury ; estates ; misconduct ; probating ; charging ; fee ; allegations ; Discipline Board ; Complainant ; restitution ; preponderance of the evidence ; accelerated judgment ; mitigation ; suspension ; County Circuit |
| Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
|
(3) For a period of 120 days; Effective November 4, 1981. Center St., Alma, The Attorney Discipline Board affirmed the hearing panel findings of neglect of a personal...
| Concepts: | estate ; Attorney Discipline Board ; suspension ; failure ; neglect ; fixed term ; warranted sus-pension ; personal injury ; panel findings ; lieu of granting ; arrangements |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Alma |
| County: | Gratiot |
|
|
|
|
In re Phillip Smith, File No. 35166-A (1981). Respondent failed to comply with the order of discipline and was charged accordingly in a new formal complaint heard by the...
| Concepts: | respondent ; discipline ; hearing panel ; suspension ; practiced law ; clients ; courts ; attorney ; professional activity ; accepted fees ; legal assistance ; misconduct ; violations ; enforcement ; revocation ; disbarment |
| Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
|
The hearing panel found that Respondent had been suspended for 120 days by a prior order of the Michigan Supreme Court affirming an Attorney Disciplice Board decision. ...
| Concepts: | panel findings ; practice law ; suspension ; Respondent ; attorney ; clients ; Discipline Board ; General Counsol ; prepared documents ; divorce matter ; review reduced ; Supreme Court ; affidavit of compliance ; non-compliance |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Alma |
| County: | Gratiot |
|
|
|
|
DETROIT. MICHIGAN 48226 TELEPHONE:(313) 963-5553 Pursuant to Respondent's felony conviction, his license was automatically suspended pending a hearing scheduled by a Board...
| Concepts: | suspended pending ; felony conviction ; Cause ; Respondent ; Pursuant |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Alma |
| County: | Gratiot |
|
|
|
|
Revocation of license. Effective 22 August 1985. Street, The hearing panel found that Respondent was convicted of embezzlement over $100, and had been disciplined on two...
| Concepts: | panel found ; Costs ; occasions ; embezzlement ; Respondent ; Effective ; Revocation |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Alma |
| County: | Gratiot |
|
|
|
|
10 JAN21 Tri-County Hearing Panel #82 of the Attorney Discipline Board entered an order in this matter on July 21, 2009 denying the petition for reinstatement filed by...
| Concepts: | Attorney Discipline Board ; review proceedings ; amount ; costs ; reinstatement ; denying ; matter ; panel ; instruction sheet ; proper crediting ; Petitioner sought ; consideration of the briefs |
| Type: | Board Order |
|
|
|
|
continuously suspended since November4, 1981, the effective date ofa 120 day suspension ordered by the Attorney Discipline Board, based upon a hearing panel'sfinding...
| Concepts: | Grievance Administrators ; practicing law ; reinstatement ; Thomas Bruno ; hearing panel ; petitioner admitted ; felony convictions ; Attorney Discipline ; responsibilities ; cross-examination ; petitioners ; tax returns ; IRS ; correspondence ; public hearing ; fiscal responsibility |
| Type: | Opinion |
|
|