|
1) Revocation; 2) Effective June 17, 1995. The panel found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that respondent filed vexatious pleadings in the Oakland County Circuit ...
| Concepts: | respondent ; Supreme Court ; panel ; costs ; pleadings ; revocation ; practice law ; County Circuit ; filed vexatious ; Rules of Professional ; preponderance of the evidence |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
2) Effective June 17, 1995. Tri-County Hearing Panel #9 found that respondent engaged in repeated and routine filing of pleadings that contained scandalous, spurious,...
| Concepts: | respondent ; attorneys ; panel ; discipline ; petition ; stay ; Professional Responsibility ; Michigan Supreme ; Grievance Administrator ; three-year suspension ; practice law ; then-applicable Code ; Formal Complaint ; unfounded statements ; contained scandalous |
| Type: | Notice |
|
|
|
|
The respondent filed a petition seeking review of the order of revocation entered in this matter by Tri-County Hearing The Board has conducted review accordance with MCR...
| Concepts: | respondent ; matters ; parties ; level of discipline ; counsel ; James Lepley ; Frank Cornelius ; Grievance Administrator ; mistaken impression ; request fora ; day suspension ; Summary Disposition ; spurious allegations ; complaint charged ; consideration of the authorities |
| Type: | Opinion |
|
|