|
Suspension - 180 Days Effective January 17, 2015 The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline, in accordance with...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; respondent ; parties ; accordance ; discipline ; stipulation ; alleged misconduct ; condition relevant ; practice law ; Attorney Grievance ; complainant |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Southfield |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|
|
|
In October of2014, respondent stipulated to the entry ofa consent order of discipline based on a plea of no contest to the allegation that he violated MRPC 1.15(b )(3) by...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; Grievance Administrator ; complainants ; lacked jurisdiction ; forensic accountant ; stipulation ; discipline ; responsibility ; client trust ; restitution ; Board Opinion ; allegations ; participating |
| Type: | Opinion |
|
|
|
|
On December 10, 2014, Tri-County Hearing Panel #56 of the Attorney Discipline Board pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, entered an order suspending respondent's...
| Concepts: | Attorney Discipline Board ; hearing panel ; suspension ; funds ; respondent ; parties ; accompanying opinion ; reasons set ; client trust ; Grievance Administrator ; practice law ; consideration of the briefs ; cross-petition ; disbursement ; reinstatement |
| Type: | Board Order |
|
|
|
|
Suspension - 180 Days Effective January 17, 2015 The respondent and the Grievance Administrator filed a stipulation for a consent order of discipline, in accordance with...
| Concepts: | hearing panel ; respondent ; complainant ; Michigan Supreme Court ; parties ; accordance ; discipline ; stipulation ; Total costs ; alleged misconduct ; condition relevant ; practice law |
| Type: | Notice |
| City: | Southfield |
| County: | Oakland |
|
|